Response to online comment by calebsmum to article on Blue Lives Matter website, article titled “Nationwide Manhunt For Michael Bullinger After Multiple Dead Women Found On His Property” dated June 21, 2017
Some background: calebsmum was responding to someone who disagreed with his/her favorable stand on gun control which morphed into what his/her true issues seem to be.
calebsmum How do we pollute less? Lots of way. 🙂 Live close to your work so that you can walk or bike instead of commute 30 minutes to an hour, like many people do. Use carpools, public transportation, bikes; use solar or other alternative energy sources to heat/cool your home. If you don’t need it, don’t use it (air conditioning). Many people use it just to be comfortable when it’s not necessary, instead stay cool by closing doors and windows during the heat of the day, using deciduous trees to block the sun during the summer but allow heat during the winter…we CAN do more, it’s just that many people feel selfishly entitled to what they want, instead of what’s best.
My response: You are a very dangerous person. You presume to know what’s “best.” Best for whom? Everyone? The entire world? Just who the hell are you to make such assumptions? You think that everyone should live as you choose to live and everyone should agree with your ideologies. And if they don’t, you call them selfish? Selfish according to your personal judgment? Again, just who the hell are you? You think that you have all the answers to save the world and mankind. You see no problem with infringing on others’ rights or freedoms when it will enforce your personal beliefs.
That is the definition of fascism. You feel it is just fine to tax, fine, and even imprison people if they don’t adhere to your ideas of what is right for all of mankind. God made this planet and presented it to man. God Himself gave man the freedom to choose who to worship and obey, and you weren’t on the list of choices.
Who or what the hell gave you the superior authority to overrule anyone on how they should live, where they should live, how they should heat or cool their homes, what form of transportation they should use or how comfortable they should be while doing any of that?
And none of that has anything to do with whether people have the right to keep and bear arms without restrictions being placed on them when they purchase such weapons. But you think you’re so morally superior and have so much more knowledge that you should be able to dictate that as well.
And when people refuse to comply with all your high and mighty edicts then the punishments are visited on them. Well, if you wish to call me selfish, that is your label not mine. I am an individual and I have the freedom to make my own choices. I will not comply with enforced morality based on computer models and junk science and consensus rather than empirical, factual evidence. Not when it is in regard to how I live my life or how I defend my life.
You, and those who think as you do, are pompous asses. You seek to rule over people in every aspect of their daily lives and control them completely because you think you have that superior right, much as Islam rules over people. Well, if God didn’t seek to force me to agree with Him and gave me dominion over the earth, if He didn’t try to force me to worship Him, I sure as hell am not about to bow down to you and your ideas of what is important or necessary for the earth to survive and I’m never going to be forced to worship at the altar of man-made computer models which pose as science.
As for your ideas on gun control, stop fearing your fellow-man. The only reason you want gun control is because, when people refuse to do what you tell them to do, you don’t want them armed and able to defend themselves to prevent their being imprisoned for not complying. Even God didn’t go that far. So who the hell are you to think your ideas are more worthwhile than His? You are a fascist and you label others as fascists for not agreeing with you. That’s what the left always does. They paint others with the identifying label before it is used against them. Saul Alinsky much?
You know perfectly well that it isn’t safety against unhinged people having guns that is at the heart of this gun control argument. It sounds all compassionate, but it’s really about keeping the populace under control so that other restrictive rules can be pushed down people’s throats and then, when they refuse to be pushed any further, they won’t be able to defend themselves from being pushed the last few steps into complete domination by tyranny. This isn’t NRA talking points. Read history from ancient times through to the present day. It’s always the same pattern. As I said in the beginning, you are a very dangerous person.